Friday, October 21, 2011

你是我的伊人

推著前面的購物車,媽媽在丟東西進來。都是吃的。
突然,熟悉的紅色包裝被媽媽丟了進來。

KitKat。我心涼了一半。


坐在車裡, 媽媽在旁邊念丫念丫的,我微笑得聽著。
突然,熟悉的場景跑進了自己的視線裡。

是華利。我心振了一下。


望著FB旁邊在線欄,呆呆得看著綠燈中唯一的空格。
突然,亮了起來,我等我的留言被回复。

又下了。我心瞬間死了。


籃球聲蹦蹦響著,我沒辦法控制得走上熟悉的樓梯。
等著你轉頭,想你像以前那樣得走向我。

你沒有。我心已明白了。


坐著你的對面,你那雙小小的眼睛連眨都沒眨一下。
我把手放在膝上。快說話啊你,我心想。

你沉默。我心早就懂了。


我蹲在路邊,專心著看著那小籬笆,看到了你回來。
我背對著你,不希望看到那冷冷的目光。

你走了。我心終於灰了。



宋承憲曾經問金泰熙:到底是為什麼在這麼大的皇宮裡,走到哪都有你?
金泰熙說:大概是因為住在一起,又連心情都一樣的緣故吧?

我想。我們大概是因為心情不一樣,所以不管一方多麼努力,都不會相遇。

Saturday, October 15, 2011

F.CUZ (;

会与F.Cuz激起火花,是因为偶然在郭书瑶的歌曲中游下游下,
看到F.Cuz跟郭书瑶一起唱的Jiggy,是首很可爱的歌 :D
其实不是首很有很有水准的歌,只是纯粹很轻快kawaiiiii罢了;)



其实呢,基于本小姐糊涂的性格,我的simcard又不见了:(
很本领对吧?简直就是天才丫!
加上:我的脾气真的不好,真的不好,真的不好啊。
加上:上次已经有sim card弄不见的经验,所以呢。
知道自己一定会因为这件事情难过,发脾气。
所以自己尽量保持心情愉快 ;) 这叫情绪管理啊!哈哈哈。
所以呢,这几天重复。重复。重复。重复。得再听这首歌。好听丫!:D

这是郭书瑶 (:


大家对她的印象因为《爱的抱抱》应该很不好。
可是我个人觉得她很可爱,很孝顺,而且是个很努力追求进步的女生。
 一切嘛,都是经纪公司不会想,不会思考,哈哈。
她的这张专辑《Honey》很甜美很可爱,很多人也看到她的进步(:
 有没有实力不是重点,重要的是在演艺圈里面,开头是那么得坎坷,
 还能坚强得走下去,并且做出这么大这么的大的进步,这叫敬业,帅。

F.Cuz的成员;)))   李唯


不管咯,先介绍我最喜欢的,哈哈哈哈哈哈。
他是李唯,超级可爱的C:
很喜欢额头很漂亮的男生,厚厚的嘴唇。哈哈。
其实,整个就是小孩子的脸蛋,不过呢,没关系,我喜欢;)
 眼睛超会放电的,笑容也超可爱,怎么能够这么可爱丫!:D

 F.Cuz的成员;)))  金镇喆


他是金镇喆,尔,他本来应该是我最喜欢的。
很像我会欣赏的类型。脸长长的,白白的,像潘玮柏那样的。
可是,我就比较喜欢李唯。不懂为什么....
应该是头发的关系吧?他刘海放下来不好看,
可是如果前面的刘海翘起来,露出他的额头,那个真的很可爱(;
跟李唯有的比哟。嘻嘻。

  F.Cuz的成员;)))  崔荣学


 他是崔荣学。对他没有很特别喜欢。
 但是,他的笑容让人很有安全感。
感觉是个很温柔很温柔的人C;

  F.Cuz的成员;))) 沈艺浚


他是沈艺浚,虽然呢,名字里面有我名字里我最喜欢的艺字。
但是呢,我不怎么喜欢他。
头发是个问题。很讨厌男生这样一peh头发放下来,
放下来还看不到眼睛的,我整个很反感。
所以说,发型对一个男生来说真的很重要。

对F.Cuz没有特别的喜欢,因为还没真正看到他们的实力。
只是纯粹觉得这首Jiggy很可爱很好听罢了(;
 大家,可以去听听哦...身体会自动一直摇,哈哈。Kit超好的 :D



(;



Tuesday, October 11, 2011

The Almighty God



PLEASE FINISH THIS C:



An atheist professor of philosophy speaks to his class on the problem science has with God, The Almighty.
He asks one of his new students to stand and…..

Prof: So you believe in God?

Student: Absolutely, sir.

Prof: Is God good?

Student: Sure.

Prof: Is God all-powerful?

Student: Yes..

Prof: My brother died of cancer even though he prayed to God to heal him. Most of us would attempt to help others who are ill. But God didn’t. How is this God good then? Hmm?
(Student is silent.)

Prof: You can’t answer, can you? Let’s start again, young fella. Is God good?

Student: Yes.

Prof: Is Satan good?

Student: No.

Prof: Where does Satan come from?

Student: From….God…

Prof: That’s right. Tell me son, is there evil in this world?

Student: Yes.

Prof: Evil is everywhere, isn’t it? And God did make everything. Correct?

Student: Yes.

Prof: So who created evil?
(Student does not answer.)

Prof: Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things exist in the world, don’t they?

Student: Yes, sir.

Prof: So, who created them?
(Student has no answer.)

Prof: Science says you have 5 senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Tell me, son…Have you ever seen God?

Student: No, sir.

Prof: Tell us if you have ever heard your God?

Student: No, sir.

Prof: Have you ever felt your God, tasted your God, smelt your God? Have you ever had any sensory perception of God for that matter?

Student: No, sir. I’m afraid I haven’t.

Prof: Yet you still believe in Him?

Student: Yes.

Prof: According to empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your GOD doesn’t exist.
What do you say to that, son?

Student: Nothing. I only have my faith.

Prof: Yes. Faith. And that is the problem science has.

Student: Professor, is there such a thing as heat?

Prof: Yes.

Student: And is there such a thing as cold?

Prof: Yes.

Student: No sir. There isn’t.
(The lecture the after becomes very quiet with this turn of events.)

Student: Sir, you can have lots of heat, even more heat, superheat, mega heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat..But we don’t have anything called cold. We can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but we can’t go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold. Cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat is energy Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it .
(There is pin-drop silence in the lecture theatre.)

Student: What about darkness, Professor? Is there such a thing as darkness?

Prof: Yes. What is night if there isn’t darkness?

Student : You’re wrong again, sir. Darkness is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light…..But if you have no light constantly, you have nothing and it’s called darkness, isn’t it? In reality, darkness isn’t. If it were you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn’t you?

Prof: So what is the point you are making, young man?

Student: Sir, my point is your philosophical premise is flawed.

Prof: Flawed? Can you explain how?

Student: Sir, you are working on the premise of duality. You argue there is life and then there is death, a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can’t even explain a thought.. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one.To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death isnot the opposite of life: just the absence of it.
Now tell me, Professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?

Prof: If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, yes, of course, I do.

Student: Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?
(The Professor shakes his head with a smile, beginning to realize where the argument is going.)

Student: Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you not a scientist but a preacher? (The class is in uproar.)

Student: Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the Professor’s brain?
(The class breaks out into laughter.)

Student : Is there anyone here who has ever heard the Professor’s brain, felt it, touched or smelt it? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain,sir. With all due respect, sir, how do we then trust your lectures, sir?
(The room is silent. The professor stares at the student, his face unfathomable.)

Prof: I guess you’ll have to take them on faith, son.

Student: That is it sir… The link between man & God is FAITH . That is all that keeps things moving & alive.


Saturday, October 8, 2011

羽球風雲

羽球場上。可以聽到羽球拍在空中快速掃過的“咻”聲,可以聽到羽球被羽球拍打到的一瞬间那輕輕的“啪”聲,可以聞到那臭臭的汗味,和在羽球場上的雙雙球鞋摩擦的聲音。



他。被我注意到。他在球場的英姿真的很難去不去注意。每顆球都抓得這麼準,真的不容易。帥。是個9歲的小男孩,是朋友的弟弟。可愛到不行。那雙水汪汪的大眼睛,連皺眉頭都那麼可愛。他的實力頓時成了球場的焦點,隔壁場的高二學長們一直看著他,哈哈,嘴巴一直念:藝綾我輸了咯。哈哈,當然啊。帥啊,怎麼能夠這麼引人注意 ;)

16歲他跟9歲他對打了起來。16歲他一直在讓9歲他,16歲他在放水,我看得出。結果9歲他也不甘落後,帥氣的殺了一粒球給16歲他,球以直線的方式直直的掃過了16歲他的肩旁上方。16歲他躲了躲,被嚇倒了唄。結果16歲他不甘心不甘心地走到網前,對著也在網前的9歲他放狠話說:欸,我們來雙打,我跟你一組。

我以為16歲他是看9歲他很有實力,所以才跟9歲他一隊,結果我一直看到16歲他一直欺負9歲的他,一直拿球拍打9歲他的屁股。根本就是輸不起嘛XD 還一直搶球,讓9歲他不能打到,以大欺小,哼。9歲他的姊姊說16歲他和9歲他站在一起很像父子。我皺了皺眉,感覺就像兩個小孩子嘛,比較像兄弟。可是畫面很美,很溫馨,很可愛。我想幸虧16他沒有弟弟,不然他一定寵死他弟弟了。然後就到我們打了。

我她。一组。他她。一组。比赛。开始。我方。开球。她先。紧张。对方。防备。突然。


“旁!”


啊?什么声音?一秒。两秒。三秒。哦。原来是站在我旁边差不多15cm的她开球开的技术死不好,往上抬的羽球拍恰巧以准180度敲中了我的右头脑的旁边。第四秒。痛!
我顿时感觉眼前一片空白,刚刚发生了什么事我记不住了,突然意识消失了,平衡感没了,好晕,我跌坐在地板上。我捂住痛处,好痛好痛。

朦朧中看到對面場的他和她跑來我身旁。以為,起碼,至少,顧念朋友之情,他會很好心,很同情得問聲“誒,會痛嗎?” 還是“誒,還好不?” (這是人之常情吧!)結果。結果。結果。損友。一個個都是損友。他竟然跑來很專心得看了看我,問:


“誒,牙套沒飛掉吧?”  (^^)




這種損友。白交了。白交了。
;)